Regarding that, since this ritual has repeated several times, what about
becoming a committer?
Cool. I'd certainly like that.

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can't think of a single reason why this is the case.Disallowing the
> change of an operation name? sure.
> This? I can't figure out what I was thinking, thus, it is useless.
> Please make the change.
>
> Regarding that, since this ritual has repeated several times, what about
> becoming a committer?
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Bart Reyserhove <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yeah I know, that's what I tried to explain yesterday. I just cannot think
>> of a reason why we would want this. There is even a test case for it that
>> tests that you cannot change the name.
>> Do I change it and the test as well?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Took me a LONG time to figure out what is going on.
>>> Check the mapping:
>>>
>>>         <property name="Name"
>>>                             access="property"
>>>                             type="String"
>>>                             update="false">
>>>             <column name="Name"
>>>                             length="255"
>>>                             not-null="true"
>>>                             unique="true"/>
>>>         </property>
>>>
>>> Can you think of any reason why we would want this to be the case?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Bart Reyserhove <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, I meant UsersGroup but it is also the case for EntitiesGroup, so
>>>> it definitely has a reason ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Bart Reyserhove <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I checked the EntitiesGroup mapping file and apparently the property
>>>>> Name has an attribute "update=false". Why is that?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Bart Reyserhove <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Attached a patch with a test case that fails.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hm...
>>>>>>> Can you create a small test case for this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Bart Reyserhove <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep, I changed the name of the usersgroup.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you updating any of the fields to a new value?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Bart Reyserhove <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I tried to figure out this one myself but it's probably too
>>>>>>>>>> late in the evening and I'm probably overlooking something stupid. In
>>>>>>>>>> Rhino.Security there are UsersGroup and I want to change the name of 
>>>>>>>>>> one of
>>>>>>>>>> those.
>>>>>>>>>> I have a very small edit page to do that which posts to the
>>>>>>>>>> following controller method:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [SecuredOperation("Edit")]
>>>>>>>>>>         public virtual ActionResult Update(Guid id)
>>>>>>>>>>         {
>>>>>>>>>>             var usersGroup = _userGroupService.Get(id);
>>>>>>>>>>             SmartBinder.UpdateFrom(usersGroup, Request.Form);
>>>>>>>>>>             try
>>>>>>>>>>             {
>>>>>>>>>>                 _userGroupService.Save(usersGroup);
>>>>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>>>>             catch (ValidationException e)
>>>>>>>>>>             {
>>>>>>>>>>                 TempData["errors"] =
>>>>>>>>>> e.Summary.GetLocalizedErrorMessages();
>>>>>>>>>>                 return View("New",
>>>>>>>>>> BuildViewData(usersGroup).WithTitle(Resources.User.NewTitle));
>>>>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>>>>             return this.RedirectToAction(c => c.List());
>>>>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The 'Save' method from the _userGroupService is called with the
>>>>>>>>>> updated usersGroup. I checked that and it is indeed changed there.
>>>>>>>>>> The very fancy 'Save' method looks like this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [Transaction]
>>>>>>>>>>         public virtual void Save(UsersGroup instance)
>>>>>>>>>>         {
>>>>>>>>>>             _userGroupRepos.SaveOrUpdate(instance);
>>>>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In NhProf I see that a transaction is started and committed but
>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing done in the transaction. The UsersGroup is using 
>>>>>>>>>> the second
>>>>>>>>>> level cache, so maybe it has something to do with that but I'm not 
>>>>>>>>>> sure.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If anyone can shed some light on this one, that would be most
>>>>>>>>>> welcome ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Greetz,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bart
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to