ok..i just implemented as an IMessageModule on the trunk
On Jan 23, 6:11 am, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that it is creating _transactional_ queues by default.
> The reason that it exists in this manner is quite simple. It reduce the
> number of things that you need to do to use RSB. You don't have to go and
> explicitly create the queue.
> It just happens.
> One less thing to do.
>
> I see no problem with moving the responsibility to Rhino Service Bus
> Facility, though.
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Mike Nichols <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > I just committed some fixes to the FlatQueue implementation in RSB
> > 1. A #subscriptions queue is required as a sibling queue
> > 2. Initialization of queues in Transport is based on the strategy
>
> > One question though: We are currently only creating nontransactional
> > queues if they don't already exist. SHould we add a config option on
> > the facility to specify IsTransactional ? Or should the creation of a
> > queue even be in the Transport...it seems like a SRP violation to have
> > it in there and should just throw if it can't new() the queue.
> > Queue setup like creation, purging, and so on seems like it should be
> > the burden of the app code, not RSB. A simple static class could
> > provide these utilities ala PrepareQueues in sample.
>
> > mike
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
