Yes, we probably should do that. On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Simone Busoli <[email protected]>wrote:
> If it's just for the WaitOne method, I think you can safely fallback on the > WaitOne which accepts another bool parameter, which is in 3.5 non SP1. > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, like NHib Profiler, its requires 3.5 SP1 which I have not installed, >> mainly because non of my clients use 3.5 SP1. I guess it is time to >> encourage them to do so. Did you install just the plain 3.5 SP1 or include >> follow up hot fixes? >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> or use a latest build from nant >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> nant -t:net-3.5 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ayende, >>>>> >>>>> When I do a buildfromtrunk it seems that it is building with 2.0 libs >>>>> since it is not finding a WaitOne(TimeSpan). Do I need to change any >>>>> configs to ensure nant will use 3.5? >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> craig >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, I'll get the latest and pray :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Done with slicing the repository for now :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Craig Neuwirt >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, João Bragança < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Patch uploaded to file section... I really don't like the way I >>>>>>>>>> patched this, seems really hacky to me. But I can't see another >>>>>>>>>> way to >>>>>>>>>> fix other than totally rewriting binsor to use fluent registration >>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> one pass. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That is my intention and kinda positioned binsor for that. I'll >>>>>>>>> check out the patch, but >>>>>>>>> not sure if Ayende is finishing slicing and dicing of the >>>>>>>>> repository yet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 7:45 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> > Have fun, but don't code & drive, I understand it it dangerous. >>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:43 PM, João Bragança < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > I ran into something unexpected today, you can't override a >>>>>>>>>> service >>>>>>>>>> > > dependency with the extend macro: >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > component "first", SomeDependency: >>>>>>>>>> > > ID = "First" >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > component "second", SomeDependency: >>>>>>>>>> > > ID = "Second" >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > component "someComponent", SomeComponent: >>>>>>>>>> > > dependency = @first >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > extend "someComponent": >>>>>>>>>> > > dependency = @second >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > SomeComponent someComponent = >>>>>>>>>> container.Resolve<SomeComponent>(); >>>>>>>>>> > > Assert.AreEqual("Second", someComponent.Dependency.ID); >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > I'm gonna patch this unless there are any objections. I have a >>>>>>>>>> 12 pack >>>>>>>>>> > > this time, should be cake. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
