Are there any plans to make rhino target 3.5 only?
On Feb 18, 8:17 am, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, we probably should do that.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Simone Busoli
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > If it's just for the WaitOne method, I think you can safely fallback on the
> > WaitOne which accepts another bool parameter, which is in 3.5 non SP1.
>
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Well, like NHib Profiler, its requires 3.5 SP1 which I have not installed,
> >> mainly because non of my clients use 3.5 SP1. I guess it is time to
> >> encourage them to do so. Did you install just the plain 3.5 SP1 or include
> >> follow up hot fixes?
>
> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> or use a latest build from nant
>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>>> nant -t:net-3.5
>
> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Craig Neuwirt
> >>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>>>> Ayende,
>
> >>>>> When I do a buildfromtrunk it seems that it is building with 2.0 libs
> >>>>> since it is not finding a WaitOne(TimeSpan). Do I need to change any
> >>>>> configs to ensure nant will use 3.5?
>
> >>>>> thanks,
> >>>>> craig
>
> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>>>>> :-)
>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Craig Neuwirt
> >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> Ok, I'll get the latest and pray :-)
>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ayende Rahien
> >>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Done with slicing the repository for now :-)
>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Craig Neuwirt
> >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, João Bragança <
> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Patch uploaded to file section... I really don't like the way I
> >>>>>>>>>> patched this, seems really hacky to me. But I can't see another
> >>>>>>>>>> way to
> >>>>>>>>>> fix other than totally rewriting binsor to use fluent registration
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>> one pass.
>
> >>>>>>>>> That is my intention and kinda positioned binsor for that. I'll
> >>>>>>>>> check out the patch, but
> >>>>>>>>> not sure if Ayende is finishing slicing and dicing of the
> >>>>>>>>> repository yet.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 7:45 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> > Have fun, but don't code & drive, I understand it it dangerous.
> >>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:43 PM, João Bragança <
> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> > > I ran into something unexpected today, you can't override a
> >>>>>>>>>> service
> >>>>>>>>>> > > dependency with the extend macro:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> > > component "first", SomeDependency:
> >>>>>>>>>> > > ID = "First"
>
> >>>>>>>>>> > > component "second", SomeDependency:
> >>>>>>>>>> > > ID = "Second"
>
> >>>>>>>>>> > > component "someComponent", SomeComponent:
> >>>>>>>>>> > > dependency = @first
>
> >>>>>>>>>> > > extend "someComponent":
> >>>>>>>>>> > > dependency = @second
>
> >>>>>>>>>> > > SomeComponent someComponent =
> >>>>>>>>>> container.Resolve<SomeComponent>();
> >>>>>>>>>> > > Assert.AreEqual("Second", someComponent.Dependency.ID);
>
> >>>>>>>>>> > > I'm gonna patch this unless there are any objections. I have a
> >>>>>>>>>> 12 pack
> >>>>>>>>>> > > this time, should be cake.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
