I've switched some projects to target 3.5 in the last couple of days (commons and etl), but I guess some are still targeting 2.0.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it should be. > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:32 AM, João Bragança > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Are there any plans to make rhino target 3.5 only? >> >> On Feb 18, 8:17 am, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Yes, we probably should do that. >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Simone Busoli < >> [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > > If it's just for the WaitOne method, I think you can safely fallback >> on the >> > > WaitOne which accepts another bool parameter, which is in 3.5 non SP1. >> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> Well, like NHib Profiler, its requires 3.5 SP1 which I have not >> installed, >> > >> mainly because non of my clients use 3.5 SP1. I guess it is time to >> > >> encourage them to do so. Did you install just the plain 3.5 SP1 or >> include >> > >> follow up hot fixes? >> > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >>> or use a latest build from nant >> > >> > >>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> > >>>> nant -t:net-3.5 >> > >> > >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Craig Neuwirt < >> [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > >>>>> Ayende, >> > >> > >>>>> When I do a buildfromtrunk it seems that it is building with 2.0 >> libs >> > >>>>> since it is not finding a WaitOne(TimeSpan). Do I need to change >> any >> > >>>>> configs to ensure nant will use 3.5? >> > >> > >>>>> thanks, >> > >>>>> craig >> > >> > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> > >>>>>> :-) >> > >> > >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Craig Neuwirt < >> [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > >>>>>>> Ok, I'll get the latest and pray :-) >> > >> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ayende Rahien < >> [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > >>>>>>>> Done with slicing the repository for now :-) >> > >> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Craig Neuwirt < >> [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, João Bragança < >> > >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Patch uploaded to file section... I really don't like the way >> I >> > >>>>>>>>>> patched this, seems really hacky to me. But I can't see >> another >> > >>>>>>>>>> way to >> > >>>>>>>>>> fix other than totally rewriting binsor to use fluent >> registration >> > >>>>>>>>>> in >> > >>>>>>>>>> one pass. >> > >> > >>>>>>>>> That is my intention and kinda positioned binsor for that. >> I'll >> > >>>>>>>>> check out the patch, but >> > >>>>>>>>> not sure if Ayende is finishing slicing and dicing of the >> > >>>>>>>>> repository yet. >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 7:45 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>> > Have fun, but don't code & drive, I understand it it >> dangerous. >> > >>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:43 PM, João Bragança < >> > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > I ran into something unexpected today, you can't override >> a >> > >>>>>>>>>> service >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > dependency with the extend macro: >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > component "first", SomeDependency: >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > ID = "First" >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > component "second", SomeDependency: >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > ID = "Second" >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > component "someComponent", SomeComponent: >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > dependency = @first >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > extend "someComponent": >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > dependency = @second >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > SomeComponent someComponent = >> > >>>>>>>>>> container.Resolve<SomeComponent>(); >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > Assert.AreEqual("Second", someComponent.Dependency.ID); >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > I'm gonna patch this unless there are any objections. I >> have a >> > >>>>>>>>>> 12 pack >> > >>>>>>>>>> > > this time, should be cake. >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
