So I replaced all the WaitOnes and it compiles fine now.  Is it ok the check
in?

craig

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, we probably should do that.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Simone Busoli 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> If it's just for the WaitOne method, I think you can safely fallback on
>> the WaitOne which accepts another bool parameter, which is in 3.5 non SP1.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Well, like NHib Profiler, its requires 3.5 SP1 which I have not
>>> installed, mainly because non of my clients use 3.5 SP1.  I guess it is time
>>> to encourage them to do so.  Did you install just the plain 3.5 SP1 or
>>> include follow up hot fixes?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> or use a latest build from nant
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> nant -t:net-3.5
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ayende,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   When I do a buildfromtrunk it seems that it is building with 2.0
>>>>>> libs since it is not finding a WaitOne(TimeSpan).  Do I need to change 
>>>>>> any
>>>>>> configs to ensure nant will use 3.5?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>   craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Craig Neuwirt 
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll get the latest and pray :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ayende Rahien 
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Done with slicing the repository for now :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, João Bragança <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Patch uploaded to file section... I really don't like the way I
>>>>>>>>>>> patched this, seems really hacky to me. But I can't see another
>>>>>>>>>>> way to
>>>>>>>>>>> fix other than totally rewriting binsor to use fluent
>>>>>>>>>>> registration in
>>>>>>>>>>> one pass.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That is my intention and kinda positioned binsor for that.  I'll
>>>>>>>>>> check out the patch, but
>>>>>>>>>> not sure if Ayende is finishing slicing and dicing of the
>>>>>>>>>> repository yet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 7:45 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > Have fun, but don't code & drive, I understand it it dangerous.
>>>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:43 PM, João Bragança <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > I ran into something unexpected today, you can't override a
>>>>>>>>>>> service
>>>>>>>>>>> > > dependency with the extend macro:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > component "first", SomeDependency:
>>>>>>>>>>> > >        ID = "First"
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > component "second", SomeDependency:
>>>>>>>>>>> > >        ID = "Second"
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > component "someComponent", SomeComponent:
>>>>>>>>>>> > >        dependency = @first
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > extend "someComponent":
>>>>>>>>>>> > >        dependency = @second
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > SomeComponent someComponent =
>>>>>>>>>>> container.Resolve<SomeComponent>();
>>>>>>>>>>> > > Assert.AreEqual("Second", someComponent.Dependency.ID);
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > > I'm gonna patch this unless there are any objections. I have
>>>>>>>>>>> a 12 pack
>>>>>>>>>>> > > this time, should be cake.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to