Yes. On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
> So I replaced all the WaitOnes and it compiles fine now. Is it ok the > check in? > > craig > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, we probably should do that. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Simone Busoli >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> If it's just for the WaitOne method, I think you can safely fallback on >>> the WaitOne which accepts another bool parameter, which is in 3.5 non SP1. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Well, like NHib Profiler, its requires 3.5 SP1 which I have not >>>> installed, mainly because non of my clients use 3.5 SP1. I guess it is >>>> time >>>> to encourage them to do so. Did you install just the plain 3.5 SP1 or >>>> include follow up hot fixes? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> or use a latest build from nant >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> nant -t:net-3.5 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Craig Neuwirt >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ayende, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When I do a buildfromtrunk it seems that it is building with 2.0 >>>>>>> libs since it is not finding a WaitOne(TimeSpan). Do I need to change >>>>>>> any >>>>>>> configs to ensure nant will use 3.5? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>> craig >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Craig Neuwirt >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll get the latest and pray :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ayende Rahien >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Done with slicing the repository for now :-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Craig Neuwirt < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, João Bragança < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Patch uploaded to file section... I really don't like the way I >>>>>>>>>>>> patched this, seems really hacky to me. But I can't see another >>>>>>>>>>>> way to >>>>>>>>>>>> fix other than totally rewriting binsor to use fluent >>>>>>>>>>>> registration in >>>>>>>>>>>> one pass. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That is my intention and kinda positioned binsor for that. I'll >>>>>>>>>>> check out the patch, but >>>>>>>>>>> not sure if Ayende is finishing slicing and dicing of the >>>>>>>>>>> repository yet. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 7:45 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > Have fun, but don't code & drive, I understand it it >>>>>>>>>>>> dangerous. >>>>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:43 PM, João Bragança < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > I ran into something unexpected today, you can't override a >>>>>>>>>>>> service >>>>>>>>>>>> > > dependency with the extend macro: >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > component "first", SomeDependency: >>>>>>>>>>>> > > ID = "First" >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > component "second", SomeDependency: >>>>>>>>>>>> > > ID = "Second" >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > component "someComponent", SomeComponent: >>>>>>>>>>>> > > dependency = @first >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > extend "someComponent": >>>>>>>>>>>> > > dependency = @second >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > SomeComponent someComponent = >>>>>>>>>>>> container.Resolve<SomeComponent>(); >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Assert.AreEqual("Second", someComponent.Dependency.ID); >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > I'm gonna patch this unless there are any objections. I have >>>>>>>>>>>> a 12 pack >>>>>>>>>>>> > > this time, should be cake. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
