done On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes. > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So I replaced all the WaitOnes and it compiles fine now. Is it ok the >> check in? >> >> craig >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Yes, we probably should do that. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Simone Busoli <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> If it's just for the WaitOne method, I think you can safely fallback on >>>> the WaitOne which accepts another bool parameter, which is in 3.5 non SP1. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well, like NHib Profiler, its requires 3.5 SP1 which I have not >>>>> installed, mainly because non of my clients use 3.5 SP1. I guess it is >>>>> time >>>>> to encourage them to do so. Did you install just the plain 3.5 SP1 or >>>>> include follow up hot fixes? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> or use a latest build from nant >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> nant -t:net-3.5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Craig Neuwirt >>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ayende, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When I do a buildfromtrunk it seems that it is building with 2.0 >>>>>>>> libs since it is not finding a WaitOne(TimeSpan). Do I need to change >>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>> configs to ensure nant will use 3.5? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>>> craig >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Ayende Rahien >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll get the latest and pray :-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Done with slicing the repository for now :-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Craig Neuwirt < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, João Bragança < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Patch uploaded to file section... I really don't like the way I >>>>>>>>>>>>> patched this, seems really hacky to me. But I can't see another >>>>>>>>>>>>> way to >>>>>>>>>>>>> fix other than totally rewriting binsor to use fluent >>>>>>>>>>>>> registration in >>>>>>>>>>>>> one pass. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That is my intention and kinda positioned binsor for that. I'll >>>>>>>>>>>> check out the patch, but >>>>>>>>>>>> not sure if Ayende is finishing slicing and dicing of the >>>>>>>>>>>> repository yet. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 7:45 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> > Have fun, but don't code & drive, I understand it it >>>>>>>>>>>>> dangerous. >>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:43 PM, João Bragança < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > I ran into something unexpected today, you can't override a >>>>>>>>>>>>> service >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > dependency with the extend macro: >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > component "first", SomeDependency: >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > ID = "First" >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > component "second", SomeDependency: >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > ID = "Second" >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > component "someComponent", SomeComponent: >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > dependency = @first >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > extend "someComponent": >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > dependency = @second >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > SomeComponent someComponent = >>>>>>>>>>>>> container.Resolve<SomeComponent>(); >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Assert.AreEqual("Second", someComponent.Dependency.ID); >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > I'm gonna patch this unless there are any objections. I >>>>>>>>>>>>> have a 12 pack >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > this time, should be cake. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
