I generally use the fluent interface now, and the XML file just for configuration purposes.This means that my configuration is cut down to real admin level config, so it is not a chore.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:51 AM, rg <[email protected]> wrote: > > So maybe I should move to other method too if binsor is not very > popular. > I need to easily externalize my configuration and binsor allowed me to > do that easily by > loading a properties file and using them to configure the components. > What alternatives are there yet? > R > > On Apr 9, 11:18 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hm, yeah, forgot about that.You can probably just configure this as is. > Take > > a look at the sample of how to configure other facilities like that. > > > > Do note that I never tried that, I moved much more into the fluent > interface > > approach for doing that. > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:10 AM, rg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > And what about nested <bus> configuration? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
