Can you post a sample test?And I would be worried if you _didn't_ use the existing infrastructure.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: > The syntax at this point is very trivial and simply exposes partial mocks > as a static property and uses all the same underlying infrastructure. > > Sorry to disappoint.... > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1,But I would love to see the syntax that you come up with. >> I want to release 3.5.1 soon, just to catch up on what we have in the >> trunk, so if you can do it in the next few days, it would be great. >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Anybody have an issue if I add in support for partial mocks in AAA >>> syntax...? >>> >>> Long run: would like to see record/replay made obsolete and the focus >>> given to AAA entirely (RhinoMocks 4.0?) >>> >>> Thoughts? Approvals? Concerns? >>> >>> -- >>> Tim Barcz >>> ASPInsider >>> http://timbarcz.devlicio.us >>> http://www.twitter.com/timbarcz >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Tim Barcz > ASPInsider > http://timbarcz.devlicio.us > http://www.twitter.com/timbarcz > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
