Right, so wouldn't using UnitOfWork make it simpler, like we do for ASP.NET , WCF, ...
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Victor Kornov <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess that's a question to you ;) Depends on how you manage > SessionFactories.In context of RSB & message handlers, you can simply open > a session yourself at the beginning of handler method. This should be the > only place where you need to get Sessions. > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So without UnitOfWork, how are sessions made able to the application? >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> UnitOfWork doesn't really give you much anyway. >>> >>> 2009/6/23 João Bragança <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>>> With better transaction support in 2.1 should we continue to use >>>> UnitOfWork? >>>> >>>> On Jun 23, 11:09 am, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > Not quite.It will work with previous versions as well, but not as >>>> well, and >>>> > you would still need to manage NH transactions on your own. >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Corey Kaylor <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > Yes, this will only work for NH 2.1. >>>> >>> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
