Looking at the code, I think the only reason it isn't yield returning right now is so it can copy the rows. If you make an IEnumerable that copies the rows one at a time and feed that to the operation.Execute I think that is all that is needed.
On Jul 2, 7:17 am, zvolkov <[email protected]> wrote: > uhh... maybe cache only a few rows but not all? Assuming I branch in > 2, at worst I will need to cache as many rows as there is the > disparity between the two consumers of my two output streams... Makes > sense? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
