this is what I like about the SessionAdapter object I posted above.
you can use the default lifestyle of singleton. the actual session is
not retrieved (from the current session context) until you call a
member of session.

On Sep 21, 3:20 pm, Simone Busoli <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow you, if I have a component which takes an
> ISession as a ctor argument, I need to be careful to configure its
> lifestyle to be "more transient" than that of the session itself,
> right? Or I'll get an instance of the component with an out of date
> session.
>
> 2009/9/21, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>:
>
>
>
> > Simone,
> > *shrug*, the provide an ISession implementation that will access the ambient
> > session.
>
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Simone Busoli
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> That's what I don't like much with this approach, it's easy to do
> >> something wrong, because you need to be very careful about the
> >> lifestyle of your components, or you'll get into weird situations.
> >> Ideally, I wouldn't like my components to be sort of aware of the
> >> lifestyle of something they depend on, or, put in other words, I'd
> >> expect them to get the right UoW regardless of whether they are
> >> transient or singleton.
>
> >> 2009/9/21, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>:
> >> > yes
>
> >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Martin Nilsson <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> Yes, that was the case. Thanks.
> >> >> My other question regarding taking ISession as a ctor argument. Then
> >> >> all
> >> >> those classes (queryobject, service and repository) needs to be
> >> transient?
>
> >> >> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >>> You need to register the factory facility.
>
> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Martin Nilsson
> >> >>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> >>>> Ok ok :)
>
> >> >>>> I changed to this instead:
>
> >> Kernel.Register(Component.For<ISession>().LifeStyle.Transient.UsingFactoryMethod(()
> >> >>>> => Kernel.Resolve<ISessionFactory>().GetCurrentSession()));
>
> >> >>>> but then I get error:
> >> >>>> "Type NHibernate.ISession is abstract.
> >> >>>> As such, it is not possible to instansiate it as implementation of
> >> >>>> NHibernate.ISession service"
>
> >> >>>> My solution now is this (not causing the above error):
>
> >> >>>> ServiceClass:
> >> >>>>   ctor(IUnitOfWorkFactory unitOfWorkFactory)
>
> >> >>>>   In ServiceMethod:
> >> >>>>     var session = unitOfWorkFactory.CurrentSession;
>
> >> >>>> Questions:
> >> >>>> 1. Anyone knows why I get the above error?
> >> >>>> 2. Is my other solution (using IUnitOfWorkFactory) better/ok then?
> >> >>>> 3. You say that it's possible (better?) to take the ISession as a
> >> >>>> ctor
> >> >>>> arg. Will that be a different one for each req if my service class is
> >> >>>> singleton, although my session registration is transient?
>
> >> >>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]
> >> >wrote:
>
> >> >>>>> This is HORRIBLE.
> >> >>>>> You micro manage the session and remove from NH things like UoW,
> >> >>>>> auto
> >> >>>>> change tracking, persistence by reachability, etc.
> >> >>>>> Sessions should be managed by request / context, not in methods.
>
> >> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Martin Nilsson
> >> >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>> ProductService:
> >> >>>>>> public void Save(Product product) {
> >> >>>>>>   using(var session = ?.GetSession)
> >> >>>>>>   using(var tx = session.BeginTransaction())
> >> >>>>>>   {
> >> >>>>>>     repository.Add(product);
> >> >>>>>>     tx.Commit();
> >> >>>>>>   }
> >> >>>>>> }
>
> >> --
> >> Inviato dal mio dispositivo mobile
>
> --
> Inviato dal mio dispositivo mobile
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to