Confirmation of message received. You have to make several calls to ensure that.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:09 AM, rg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for warning. What exactly is the hard part in http > communication? I'd think it's ensuring each message is delivered > exactly once, but since I haven't tried that i'd like to know your > experience. > Best regards > RG > > On Oct 13, 9:54 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hm, > > I started writing Rhino Queues in HTTP, it didn't work very well because > it > > is hard to do reliable communication on HTTP. > > You can most certainly do so, but it is complex. > > RQ is running over TCP, and you can certainly just push it over port 80. > > Just that should allow you to handle firewall stuff. > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:09 PM, nightwatch77 <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe it's not the best forum to ask such question, but I was thinking > > > about making independent applications using RSB communicate with each > > > other. Of course they can send messages between them using MSMQ > > > transport, but I was thinking about plain HTTP protocol for > > > communication. Why? Because it's the easiest protocol to use and > > > configure in various environments. Now, how would it look like on > > > technical side - we could have something like 'http bridge' - a > > > component that would take messages addressed to some http endpoint > > > (like 'http://my.application.com/inbox') and send them to this > > > endpoint using normal http post. The receiver side would accept the > > > message and put it to local RSB endpoint, but the sender address for > > > that message would also be http endpoint - a http address of the > > > originating application. This way we could have transport-independent > > > means of communication, we only would have to agree on message > > > serialization format. Now, I don't need such component right now, but > > > will have to implement some communication interface for passing > > > messages between two apps built on top of a message bus. What do you > > > think -is it useful at all, or will MSMQ do just fine? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
