Ok, so in example "a", wouldn't all the records in all the files be joined, then proceed to the BusinessRules?
On Apr 7, 1:45 am, webpaul <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure either of these will work - Keep in mind the output of > the prior operation goes to the next operation. If you "unroll" your > loop you'll see you'd have some issues there. It may be simpler to > have a process that takes an input file as a parameter and launch the > entire process multiple times. > > On Apr 6, 9:15 pm, Larry R <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have a question on which pattern to use. I have x number of input > > files (XLS), which are merged, custom rules applied, magic pixie dust > > applied then inserted into a database. > > > { My syntax is off as I don't have the project in front of me } > > > So, should I do a) > > foreach( string file in Directory.GetFiles("*.xls") > > { > > Register(new JoinOperationHere ( ).Left(new > > ReadFileOperation(file).Right(new DatabaseModelRecords() ) ); > > > )} > > > Register ( new BusinessRulesOperation() ); > > Register( new WriteToDbOperation() ); > > ...etc > > > or > > b) > > foreach( string file in Directory.GetFiles("*.xls") > > { > > Register(new JoinOperationHere ( ).Left(new > > ReadFileOperation(file).Right(new DatabaseModelRecords() ) ); > > Register ( new BusinessRulesOperation() ); > > Register( new WriteToDbOperation() ); > > > ) > > > } > > > And, for bonus points, after you've done an aggregation, how would you > > use that after the end of the EtlProcess to report the number of > > records ? > > > Thanks. I really like this toolset. I've done what a previous team > > took 2 months to do, in the past 3 days. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
