ok, thanks. It solved my problem, and haven't seen any negative impact.

For people using transaction queues with a sql server, the drawback is that
with this modification, DTC will now be involved where it was not. It should
not be a probleme as, in fact, it is what it should have done.




2010/4/22 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>

> I am not sure why it is using send in single transaction, I can't think of
> a reason why it should be this way
>
>   On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Sebastien Crocquesel <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>   Hi,
>>
>> What's the purpose of SendInSingleTransaction ?
>> I'm using the OnewayBus implementation with a TransactionScope, and the
>> message sending is not enlisted in the ambient transaction.
>> It seems that MessageQueueTransactionType.Single doesn't use the
>> Transaction.Current.
>>
>> Can I change the SendInSingleTransaction by Send in the OnewayBus ? What
>> was the motivation for it ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Rhino Tools Dev" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<rhino-tools-dev%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
>>
>
>   --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Rhino Tools Dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<rhino-tools-dev%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to