SQLite isn't multi user either The solution is to provide some REST interface on top of Rhino Queues that would allow a management stuido, ala what we have in RavenDB
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Ken Baltrinic <kbaltri...@gmail.com> wrote: > We are using Rhino-esb with rhino-queues in a document management > system where it is working out quite nicely. We are using rhino- > queues because of the 4 MB message limit in MSMQ doesn't work too when > sending documents around. However the lack of visibility into the > queues for system health monitoring purposes is concerning. I see > this as primarily being a issue with the use of ESENT for storage > since it is inherently not multi-user. Does anyone see any merit in > introducing an alternative storage option (say SQLLite?) that would > permit another process to view the queues while the bus is running? > What might the cons be? > > --Ken > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to rhino-tools-dev@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rhino-tools-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to rhino-tools-dev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rhino-tools-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
