No, there has been no patch for dictionary serialization unfortunately. We would be happy to take a pull request.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Mike Nichols <[email protected]>wrote: > i thot this was patched already. i avoid dictionaries, but i also use a > json serializer that can handle most needs. servicestack serializes > dictionaries too that could probably be used for serialization. > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Dirk Schuermans <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> While looking through the user group I found a thread dating back to >> 2009 that had the same problem as me: >> >> Dictionary serialization. >> >> I'm wondering if there's been a patch in the meanwhile for this issue >> or if there's a simple fix. >> >> (I already have a method that can parse the generic type parameters) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Rhino Tools Dev" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
