Is each load balancer configured with a ready for work uri? On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Michael Lyons <[email protected]> wrote:
> When using the load balancer with RSB I'm seeing the CPU runs at near 100% > when the consumers are all busy which causes the consumers to run slower > and be free less often. > It can be simulated easily by setting up a load balancer with no consumers > listening to it and trying to send out some messages to the consumer. > > In my specific situation I have 2 load balancers with 5 threads each (each > load balancer runs a separate queue with different types of messages), > there is a consumer waiting at the other end of each load balancer with > another 20 threads each. If one of the load balancers gets congested then > all consumers run slow. When I ran the load balancer without load it > averaged ~200ms to process a message, once the load balancer was under load > (achieved by queuing over 1000 messages) it resulted in an average time of > ~1750ms, which results in the user waiting 8 times longer for their tasks > to complete. > > Is there anyway around this? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rhino-tools-dev/-/PYwMBzLg7m4J. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
