It will require me putting explicit versions when listing the dependencies
for a package.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Matt Burton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sounds good for the future plans. Do you happen to know the magic
> incantation to get NuGet to behave in this circumstance? Or is this a
> manual hack-n-slash affair?
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Matt
>
> On Dec 27, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Corey Kaylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I vote for updating to the latest. I think I'm going to change things to
> depend on the nuget packages instead of a shared lib. There have been some
> improvements in this area that would have been painful for RSB due to
> supporting multiple framework version. This should make updating things
> much quicker and easier. Likely it will just pull them down rather than
> version them.
>
> In the meantime, if you install the explicit version of log4net that RSB
> depends on it should resolve your immediate issues. I know it's a pain
> though.
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Matt Burton <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> We had a lull in our release cycle and thought I'd upgrade us to the new
>> version and I'm having some difficulty, unfortunately. Looks like there's a
>> new version of log4net out there (1.2.11) that's causing issues. Since the
>> RSB package doesn't specify an exact version of log4net it is automatically
>> upgrading that dependency, and that's causing runtime binding issues. I'd
>> like to avoid sprinkling binding redirects everywhere - they cause nothing
>> but headaches going forward. Also, it looks like the new version of log4net
>> is signed differently, which may be causing some of the problems - not
>> sure. Would it be possible to update the package so that it specifies the
>> exact log4net version or simply upgrade to the latest version of log4net
>> altogether?
>>
>> Or perhaps I need to be schooled in my NuGet-fu, in which case I'm all
>> ears...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Rhino Tools Dev" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rhino-tools-dev/-/Z_loI5Vzez0J.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Rhino Tools Dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Rhino Tools Dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to