[InternalsVisibileTo(RhinoMocks.StrongName)]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:31 PM, rod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
> I'm using internal methods in my classes and I've noticed that
> PartialMock doesn't handle them correctly.
>
> Here we have a simple test:
>
>
> using System;
> using Rhino.Mocks;
> using NUnit.Framework;
>
> namespace UnitTests
> {
> [TestFixture]
> public class RhinoMockTests
> {
> public MockRepository Mockery;
>
> [SetUp]
> public void SetUp()
> {
> Mockery = new MockRepository();
> }
>
> [Test]
> public void
> SetResult_WithOne_DoDeletateWithTwoAndResultIsTwo()
> {
> SimpleClass sut =
> Mockery.PartialMock<SimpleClass>();
>
> using (Mockery.Record())
> {
> Expect.Call(delegate { sut.SetResult("1");
> })
> .IgnoreArguments()
> .Do((Action<string>) delegate{
> sut.Result = "2"; })
> .Repeat.Once();
> }
>
> using (Mockery.Playback())
> {
> sut.SetResult("1");
> Assert.AreEqual("2", sut.Result);
> }
> }
> }
>
> public class SimpleClass
> {
> public string Result;
>
> internal virtual void SetResult(string txt)
> {
> Result = txt;
> throw new Exception("I shouldn't be called");
> }
> }
> }
>
> In this test we will get Exception("I shouldn't be called"), but if
> we made SetResult as public not virtual then test will pass.
>
> Greetings
> rod
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
