Yes, and yes.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> So what you are saying is that when you compare items which have
> expectations on them internally in the Rhino Mocks framework you use
> equals method to check if they are the same and fall back to object
> references if method not overriden?
>
> Fair point. Is this in the Rhino Mocks documentation??
>
> Is what I said above correct?
>
>
>
> On Dec 8, 12:16 pm, Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here is a test with constraints can you see any differences....
> >
> > [Test]
> >         public void
> >
> ActivityListing_LoadFacilities_ShouldCallSelectActivitiesMethodOnActivitySe­rvice
> > ()
> >         {
> >             //Create mock objects
> >             MockRepository mockRepository = new MockRepository();
> >             IActivityListingView view =
> > mockRepository.Stub<IActivityListingView>();
> >             IActivityListService activityListService =
> > mockRepository.StrictMock<IActivityListService>();
> >             IActivityService activityService =
> > mockRepository.StrictMock<IActivityService>();
> >             IRedirector redirector = mockRepository.Stub<IRedirector>
> > ();
> >             IRelationPredicateBucket bucket =
> > mockRepository.Stub<IRelationPredicateBucket>();
> >             ISortExpression sortExpression =
> > mockRepository.Stub<ISortExpression>();
> >
> >             ///SUT
> >             ActivityListingPresenter presenter = new
> > ActivityListingPresenter(view, activityListService, activityService,
> > redirector);
> >
> >             //Setup empty bag for test
> >             EntityBag<ActivityListEntity> entityBag = new
> > EntityBag<ActivityListEntity>
> >                                                           {
> >                                                               Bag =
> > new EntityCollection<ActivityListEntity>
> >
> > {
> >
> > new ActivityListEntity
> >
> > {
> >
> > Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
> >
> > Name = "Item A"
> >
>       },
> >
> > new ActivityListEntity
> >
> > {
> >
> > Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
> >
> > Name = "Item B"
> >
>       }
> >
> },
> >                                                               Count =
> > 5
> >                                                           };
> >
> >             //Setup results for stub
> >             view.IndustrialCodeName = string.Empty;
> >             view.SortExpression = String.Empty;
> >             view.MaxRows = 10;
> >             view.StartRow = 0;
> >             SetupResult.For(view.Identity).Return(Guid.NewGuid());
> >
> >             //Setup expectations
> >             Expect.Call(activityListService.SelectActivities
> > (view.StartRow, view.MaxRows, bucket, sortExpression))
> >                 .Constraints(Is.Equal(0), Is.Equal(10), Is.TypeOf
> > (typeof(IRelationPredicateBucket)), Is.TypeOf(typeof
> > (ISortExpression)))
> >                 .Return(entityBag);
> >
> >             //Move into replay mode
> >             mockRepository.ReplayAll();
> >
> >             //Call method for SUT
> >             presenter.LoadFacilities();
> >
> >             //Verify expectations
> >             mockRepository.VerifyAll();
> >         }
> >
> > On Dec 8, 12:10 pm, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Probably because the method that isn't using the prefetch is using the
> > > parameters value equality to fix things.While the prefetch doesn't
> override
> > > Equals, so we are forced to compare using references, which are
> obviously
> > > not the same
> >
> > > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > It just seems a little strange as if I use another method without the
> > > > prefetch path parameter I do not need the constrainsts. Let me digg
> up
> > > > the test case and show you what I mean. Be right back.
> > > > Thanks for you assistance so far.
> >
> > > > On Dec 8, 11:58 am, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Oh my, that was a slip.I meant, you are telling Rhino Mocks to
> expect a
> > > > call
> > > > > with that particular parameters and to not consider anything else
> to
> > > > match
> > > > > this expectation
> >
> > > > > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Actually im using LLBLGen. I dont get what mean.
> >
> > > > > > On Dec 8, 11:55 am, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > That is because without the constraints, you are telling NH
> that you
> > > > want
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > look for a call with that particular ID and that particual feth
> path
> >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Blair <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > > >                  I am a huge fan of rhino mocks but I have a
> > > > question
> > > > > > > > regarding constraints.
> >
> > > > > > > > Below is a code snippit of setting an expectation
> > > > > > > >           Expect.Call(facilityService.FindByIdentity(id,
> > > > > > > > prefetchPath))
> > > > > > > >               .Return(entity)
> > > > > > > >               .Constraints(Is.TypeOf(typeof(Guid)),
> > > > Is.TypeOf(typeof
> > > > > > > > (IPrefetchPath2)));
> >
> > > > > > > > If I take the constraints out it doesnt work but when I add
> them
> > > > > > > > everything is okay. the facilityService is create using the
> Strict
> > > > > > > > mock call.
> >
> > > > > > > > The ususual thing is on some unit tests I need to add
> constraints
> > > > like
> > > > > > > > this and other times I don't so it is a little inconsistent.
> >
> > > > > > > > Can you explain why I need to do this and wether this is a
> problem
> > > > > > > > with the tool or just me missing something and using it
> > > > > > > > incorrectly. :)
> >
> > > > > > > > Kind Regards,
> >
> > > > > > > > Blair Davidson- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to