yep On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote:
> protected internal and then use InternalsVisibleTo? > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > >> protected internal ? >> Or you can invoke the method via reflection. >> Rhino Mocks doesn't care >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Possible to set an expectation on a protected method when using partial >>> mocks? >>> >>> I can fix the issue I'm seeing easily by changing the visiblity of the >>> method to "public" but I would prefer not to do that (as I've done in the >>> code below for "ExecutionScript" - I really want it protected) >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> public abstract class WebScriptBase : IWebScript >>> { >>> public event WebScriptEventHandler ScriptComplete; >>> >>> #region Implementation of IWebScript >>> >>> public void Start() >>> { >>> var result = ExecutionScript(); >>> >>> var args = new WebScriptEventArgs(result); >>> OnComplete(args); >>> } >>> >>> #endregion >>> >>> public abstract WebScriptResult ExecutionScript(); >>> >>> protected virtual void OnComplete(WebScriptEventArgs e) >>> { >>> if (ScriptComplete != null) >>> { >>> ScriptComplete(this, e); >>> } >>> } >>> } >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
