Just wondering what your thoughts are on the following...
... some method in a class that I will be testing ...
public void Method()
{
... other stuff going on here.....
this.someClass.PerformAction().UpdateModelWithResults(this.model);
}
now in a test fixture somewhere...
[SetUp]
public void SetUp()
{
this.someClass = MockRepository.GenerateStub<SomeClass>():
}
[Test]
public void TestingOtherStuffGoingOn()
{
... some arranging ...
this.CreateSUT().Method();
... some assertions ...
}
Now in my TestingOtherStuffGoingOn test I could care less about the
someClass.PerformAction() method call because this is being testing in
some other method. But I can't test the "other stuff going on here"
logic without stubbing out another object that contains the
UpdateModelWithResults() method.
Is there anyway (or would it even make sense) for rhinomocks to
automatically create a stub of the class that contains the
UpdateModelWithResults() method instead of a null value for the
PerformAction() method?
Thoughts?
Thanks, Gary
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
