What is the usage scenario for this...seems odd to have an expectation and a stub all at the same time.
Tim On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Shane C <[email protected]> wrote: > > I seem to be going crazy because I swear that the following was > legal... > > [SetUp] > public void BeforeEachTest() > { > m_EngineMock = MockRepository.GenerateMock<Engine>(); > > m_EngineMock.Stub(stub => stub.Execute(null, null) > .IgnoreArguments() > .Return(new Result()); > } > > // Tests that need the stub to exist... > > [Test] > public void TestThatVerfiesTheEngineIsBeingExecuted() > { > m_EngineMock.Expect(mock = mock.Execute(var1, var2) > .Repeat.AtLeastOnce() > .Return(new Result()); > > m_SUT.Execute(); > > m_EngineMock.VerifyAllExpectations(); > } > > When I try to do something similar to this my expectation never > passes. The stub is blocking it but I could have sworn I'd done this > before... > > > -- Tim Barcz ASPInsider http://timbarcz.devlicio.us http://www.twitter.com/timbarcz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
