GenerateMock will return a dynamicMock, i.e. It will allow unspecified
calls to be made on it. So the behaviour you're seeing is correct
If you wanted the test to fail you could either explicitly create a
strict mock or use mockConsole.AssertWasNotCalled(x=>x.Print("b"));
2009/6/23 Kedar <[email protected]>:
>
> public interface IConsole {
> void Print(string s);
> }
>
> [TestFixture]
> public class SomeTestFixture
> {
> public void MethodToTest(IConsole console)
> {
> console.Print("a");
> console.Print("b");
> }
>
> [Test]
> public void Test()
> {
> var mockConsole = MockRepository.GenerateMock<IConsole>();
> mockConsole.Expect(x => x.Print("a"));
> MethodToTest(mockConsole);
> mockConsole.VerifyAllExpectations();
> }
> }
>
> In this example, the only expectation I have is to call Print with
> argument "a". But the code under test calls it with "a" and then with
> "b". I thought that the VerifyAllExpectations assertion would fail.
> But it does not. Is this a problem or am I doing something wrong ?
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
