I picked up AAA fairly easy and think it would be good to have. On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Adam Tybor <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +1 > Add support for multimock as well, maybe just a couple generic type > overloads. its really handy for mocking wcf proxies and idsposable. > > Mark wrote: > > I'm +1 for concentrating on AAA - is so much easier to teach newbies (not > > that I'm an expert.) > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On > > Behalf Of Tim Barcz > > Sent: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 2:13 p.m. > > To: [email protected]; Rhino Mocks > > Subject: [RhinoMocks] PartialMock for AAA > > > > > > > > Anybody have an issue if I add in support for partial mocks in AAA > > syntax...? > > > > Long run: would like to see record/replay made obsolete and the focus > given > > to AAA entirely (RhinoMocks 4.0?) > > > > Thoughts? Approvals? Concerns? > > > > -- > > Tim Barcz > > ASPInsider > > http://timbarcz.devlicio.us > > http://www.twitter.com/timbarcz > > > -- Chris Missal http://chrismissal.lostechies.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
