What is the usage of this....? The code isn't random as runtime is it? There is logic in place to determine what actual method should be called. If that is the case you can assert the different scenarios.
Tim On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Al <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a question you might help me with. > We need to verify that a method A calls any of the overloaded forms of > method B. > > e.g. I have > void B(int) > void B(int, int) > void B(int, int, int) > > and I don't care which one of those is called from my method A (at > least one must be called). > Is it possible with Rhino Mocks to define "alternative > expectations" ? Like a set of expectation from which at least one > must be met (or something like .VerifyAnyExpectation instead > of .VerifyAllExpectations) ? > > If this is not possible, what would you suggest for this scenario? > > What I did now is grouped the 3 methods in the most complex one. > The call B(x) will now be B(x, null, null), but I don't like this work- > around and I'm looking for better alternatives. > > Thanks, > Al > > > > > > > -- Tim Barcz ASPInsider http://timbarcz.devlicio.us http://www.twitter.com/timbarcz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
