Thanks for idea . if I make all public members of this derived (wrapping) class virtual, will this class be "mockable" as if it has "mockable" interface, or there will be some problems ?
O :-) From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Missal Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 6:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [RhinoMocks] Re: Unexpected method call on mocked class I would wrap it in a class that I can control. Even if you're just calling base.Method() on each of them, at least you can make assertions on it. 2009/8/3 <[email protected]> Unfortunately method aren`t virtual. Class which cause the problem is "Command" in WPF. I use it with MVVM design pattern and in UnitTest I want to check "what model do" with this class. Problem is that class is in third-party library and doesn`t implement interface usable for mocking. Does anybody have idea what to do it ? O :-) From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ayende Rahien Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [RhinoMocks] Re: Unexpected method call on mocked class Are they virtual method calls? On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Malda <[email protected]> wrote: Is there a way how to force throw exception on unexpected method call on mocked class ? It`s working on mocked interfaces but on mocked classes unexpected method calls are ignored. -- Chris Missal http://chrismissal.lostechies.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
