oh good, you're going to put it in the next patch, sweet! :-)
On Aug 11, 5:04 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> Patch :-)
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Ben M <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > oic. Well would it be worthwhile to consider adding an alternative
> > mode to support this or perhaps the following syntax?
>
> > Expect.Call(publisher.Send(null)).Permit.Once()
>
> > :)
>
> > thx
> > Ben
>
> > On Aug 11, 4:38 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Ben,Partial work in a very specific way, if a method is not intercepted,
> > it
> > > is expected that the real object will get it.
> > > As such, Repeat.Once() indicate how often this should be repeated, not
> > that
> > > only one call is permitted.
>
> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Ben M <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > yes, but doesnt this sort of defeat the purpose of using Repeat.Once
> > > > ()?
>
> > > > i mean if i'm using a strict or dynamic mock then i can use Repeat.Once
> > > > () in this way, why then can i not do this w/ a partial?
>
> > > > On Aug 11, 4:08 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Make a second call:
> > > > > Expect.Call(_publisher.Send(null))
>
> > > > > > .IgnoreArguments()
> > > > > > .Return(true)
> > > > > > .Repeat.*Never()*;
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Ben M <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > well, i made a discovery on this. If you only tell it to repeat
> > once,
> > > > > > then the other calls will subsequently go to the actual real method
> > as
> > > > > > opposed to the mock version of the method. So I've done a work
> > around
> > > > > > using Expect.Call().Do() and keeping my own count of the number of
> > > > > > calls, but this is something that in my opinion I should be able to
> > do
> > > > > > in Rhino mocks. Does anyone know how to do this without having to
> > do
> > > > > > it myself? Ayende?
>
> > > > > > On Aug 11, 2:48 pm, Ben M <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > I have a partial mock on a class I'll call 'Publisher'
>
> > > > > > > the publisher has a method called 'Publish' that in turn calls a
> > > > > > > virtual method called Send as follows:
>
> > > > > > > public class Publisher
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > public bool Publish(MyList list)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > string msg = _msgBuilder.BuildFrom(list);
> > > > > > > bool success = Send(msg);
>
> > > > > > > return success;
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > public virtual bool Send(string msg)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > /// snip
> > > > > > > return true;
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > my unit test then does the following:
> > > > > > > [SetUp]
> > > > > > > public void Setup()
> > > > > > > {
>
> > > > > > > _mocks = new MockRepository();
>
> > > > > > > _publisher = _mocks.PartialMock<Publisher>();
>
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > [Test]
> > > > > > > public void OnlyCallSendOnceForEmptyLists()
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > Expect.Call(_publisher.Send(null))
> > > > > > > .IgnoreArguments()
> > > > > > > .Return(true)
> > > > > > > .Repeat.Once;
>
> > > > > > > _mocks.ReplayAll();
>
> > > > > > > _publisher.Publish(new MyList());
> > > > > > > _publisher.Publish(new MyList());
>
> > > > > > > _mocks.VerifyAll();
>
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > I would expect this test to fail as it should be expecting no
> > more
> > > > > > > than 1 call, but the test is passing, and stepping thru the
> > debugger
> > > > I
> > > > > > > can see it IS in fact making 2 calls, yet the test still passes.
> > > > What
> > > > > > > am I doing wrong that causes this test to give me a false
> > positive?
>
> > > > > > > thanks in advance
> > > > > > > Ben
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
