That works. Thanks Chris!
On Aug 20, 6:45 pm, Chris Missal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you able to refactor to give it a backing field rather than the private
> set? I don't know why that doesn't work, but I know if you remove the
> private set and use the following, it works:
> private string name;
> public virtual string Name
> {
> get { return name; }
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Brian Low <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Is it possible to stub a property with a private (or protected)
> > setter?
>
> > public class Person
> > {
> > public virtual string Name { get; private set; }
> > }
>
> > [Test]
> > public void CanStub()
> > {
> > var personStub = MockRepository.GenerateStub<Person>();
> > personStub.Stub(p => p.Name).Return("Joe");
> > Assert.AreEqual("Joe", personStub.Name);
> > }
>
> > The above test gives an error "You are trying to set an expectation on
> > a property that was defined to use PropertyBehavior." and suggests
> > assigning a value directly - which we can't since the setter is
> > private.
>
> > Thanks!
> > Brian
>
> --
> Chris Missalhttp://chrismissal.lostechies.com/- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
