Kenneth,Yes, I think that we aren't going to have any choice and we would support side-by-side execution. I don't want to change the name, though.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Kenneth Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > > A. Agree that killing the backward compatibility is a must. All new > development should go with new syntax. > > B. On the other hand, how about the evolving project with tons of > existing tests using the old syntax? Must it stuck with old syntax > forever or totally rewrite all tests? I hope there is a better option > would allow me to keep the old tests as is and use new syntax in new > test cases being added to project. Maybe I can use 3.6 and 4.0 side by > side just like I can have NMock (real old test cases) and Rhino.Mocks > side by side in one project. > > How about a completely new namespace for 4.0? Rhino.Fakes is what I > somebody who lack of imagination, can think about. > > Cheers, > Kenneth > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
