I pushed to mine and then oren pulled....

is this the wrong workflow?

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam Dymitruk <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> requires time coordination. Why doesn't Tim just push to his branch on
> github? Then you can pull, apply from there when you're good and
> ready. Timezones can be a bitch..
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yeah,
> > Tim & I just had this ping pong between us.
> > He fixed some things, asked me to pull, and I pulled them into mine copy
> and
> > push them to github.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Adam Dymitruk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> pull requests?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Ayende Rahien<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > I think we will take this to rhino-tools, but ideally I would like to
> >> > see us
> >> > managing things using pull requests.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I committed some code (one cmall change with four test cases) on
> >> >> Saturday
> >> >> to sourceforge...did that by any chance make it in, or do I need to
> >> >> switch
> >> >> over to GIT and submit push there?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Yes
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Should we be looking and pulling source from Git now?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I want to move the entire suite to Git, yes.
> >> >>>>> Currently the SVN version has a patch that the GIT version has as
> >> >>>>> well,
> >> >>>>> but the 3.6 was released from the GIT version.
> >> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]>
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I know Oren said he was up for it.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I'm getting into Git on my own and would like see us take a spin
> >> >>>>>> down
> >> >>>>>> that road.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Adam Dymitruk <
> [email protected]>
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> I think Tim Barcz was asking about this in the 4.0 thread. Was
> the
> >> >>>>>>> silence an indication of 'no'?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>> Adam
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/adymitruk/
> >> >>>>>>> http://www.agilevancouver.net/
> >> >>>>>>> http://altnetvancouver.ning.com/
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>> Tim Barcz
> >> >>>>>> Microsoft ASPInsider
> >> >>>>>> http://timbarcz.devlicio.us
> >> >>>>>> http://www.twitter.com/timbarcz
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> Tim Barcz
> >> >>>> Microsoft ASPInsider
> >> >>>> http://timbarcz.devlicio.us
> >> >>>> http://www.twitter.com/timbarcz
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Tim Barcz
> >> >> Microsoft ASPInsider
> >> >> http://timbarcz.devlicio.us
> >> >> http://www.twitter.com/timbarcz
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Adam
> >>
> >> http://twitter.com/adymitruk/
> >> http://www.agilevancouver.net/
> >> http://altnetvancouver.ning.com/
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Adam
>
> http://adventuresinagile.blogspot.com/
> http://twitter.com/adymitruk/
> http://www.agilevancouver.net/
> http://altnetvancouver.ning.com/
>
> >
>


-- 
Tim Barcz
Microsoft ASPInsider
http://timbarcz.devlicio.us
http://www.twitter.com/timbarcz

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to