It was further enhanced so you may want to read below instead: http://kennethxu.blogspot.com/2009/07/introduce-powerful-aaa-syntax-for.html
Taking your uses case, it would be: (mock.ActivityOf(m=>m.B()) < mock.ActivityOf(m=>m.C())).AssertOccured(); (mock.ActivityOf(m=>m.S()) < mock.ActivityOf(m=>m.T())).AssertOccured(); On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Alex McMahon <[email protected]> wrote: > There was some discussion about ordered expectations for AAA and the > above is what I did as a work-around. There was also a more thorough > implementation that you can read about here > http://kennethxu.blogspot.com/2009/06/rhinomocks-ordered-expectations-for-aaa.html > but as far as I know this hasn't got into Rhino Mocks yet. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
