I could use Rhino Mocks Setup Result for the fake version, correct? Thanks, Brett
On Oct 1, 7:33 am, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for option 2 > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Alex McMahon <[email protected]> wrote: > > I go for option 2. In theory it'd be nice to do some sort of integration > > test to check that the actual service was consumable > > > 2009/9/30 Brett <[email protected]> > > >> This is not necessarily specific to Rhino.Mocks, but I'm sure it is > >> possible to use Rhino.Mocks as a solution. What is the best way to > >> achieve test coverage of code which consumes web services without > >> actually consuming the services during testing? If we use the old > >> NYSE service example and I have code which calls a stock exchange > >> service to get the current value of a symbol, I can think of two > >> options. > > >> 1. Generate a service stub based on the wsdl and implement a fake > >> version of the service on my local machine which unit tests could > >> call. In that case, for example I would always return $5.00 or > >> whatever for any symbol. > > >> 2. Wrap the service call with an interface and have 2 impls of that > >> interface; one which consumes the service and one which just returns a > >> value. > > >> I like option 2 better because you take out the http traffic in unit > >> tests, but wasn't sure what had been done in the past. Are there > >> better options? > > >> Thanks, > >> Brett > > -- > Tim Barcz > Microsoft ASPInsiderhttp://timbarcz.devlicio.ushttp://www.twitter.com/timbarcz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
