Good work around. I think maybe this is a bug in Rhino Mocks? If nobody has a better explanation then I'll add it to GitHub here: http://github.com/ayende/rhino-mocks/issues
Thanks, Scott On Oct 5, 8:59 am, Alex McMahon <[email protected]> wrote: > I wont pretend to understand why... but you can fix the test by not creating > an instance of MockRepository, instead use static method > MockRepository.GenerateStub<IDogDao>()... Once I did that it fixed the test. > > Perhaps someone with better knowledge of the internals can explain why this > is happening. I can't remember what the difference between the static and > instance methods is... It sort of sounds like a problem with > RecursiveMocking > > 2009/10/5 Scott White <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Below code reproduces the bug precisely: > > > public class Dog > > { > > public virtual int Speed { get; set; } > > public virtual bool Active { get; set; } > > } > > > public interface IDogDao > > { > > Dog GetDog(); > > } > > > public class DogDao : IDogDao > > { > > public Dog GetDog() { throw new NotImplementedException(); } > > } > > > public class MyService > > { > > public IDogDao DogDao { get; set; } > > > public void Manipulate() > > { > > Dog dog = DogDao.GetDog(); > > if (dog.Active) > > { > > dog.Speed++; > > } > > else > > { > > dog.Speed = 0; > > } > > } > > } > > > public class MyService_test > > { > > [Test] > > public void Manipulate_active_dog() > > { > > var dog = new Dog() {Active = true, Speed = 1}; > > var mocks = new MockRepository(); > > var dao = mocks.Stub<IDogDao>(); > > dao.Stub(x => x.GetDog()).Return(dog); > > MyService svc = new MyService() {DogDao = dao}; > > svc.Manipulate(); > > Assert.AreEqual(2, dog.Speed); > > } > > } > > > If I take the Virtual off of my Dog class then it doesn't throw an > > exception but my test fails because Rhino Mocks is sending a new Dog > > object with default values (not the values I set). > > > On Oct 4, 6:05 pm, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Please post the failing code/test (that always helps). > > > > Tim > > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Scott White <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I was migrating some of my R&P methods into stubs but one of them I > > > > could not convert over. This I think is because the return value is a > > > > class with all virtual properties and Rhino Mocks seems to be proxying > > > > it and not returning the values that I set. > > > > > dao.Stub(x => x.FindByUser(user.GetType(), user.Username)).Return > > > > (user); // dao.Expect has same behavior > > > > > later in my test: > > > > > service.Authenticate(..) > > > > > This service calls the dao and takes the user object and maniuplates > > > > it if necessary. Problem with this mechanism is that I'm getting an > > > > exception > > > > > Previous method 'AppUser.get_Active();' requires a return value or an > > > > exception to throw. > > > > > On a check of the Active flag within my Authenticate function. For > > > > the time being I've reverted back to recording this expectation. Any > > > > idea why Rhino Mocks is proxying my user object that is being returned > > > > or how to prevent it from doing so? > > > > -- > > > Tim Barcz > > > Microsoft ASPInsiderhttp://timbarcz.devlicio.ushttp:// > >www.twitter.com/timbarcz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
