I stand corrected! I thought I had used that behavior in the past.

Regards
On 5 Oct 2011 16:04, "Patrick Steele" <[email protected]> wrote:
> You can NOT mock non-virtual methods with moq (unless there's been a
> major update to moq that I missed). Moq uses the same DynamicProxy
> generator that Rhino.Mocks uses and their approach (generating a
> subclass and overriding virtual members to get method interception) is
> the same -- and they are therefore both limited to only intercepting
> virtual members of a class.
>
> ---
> Patrick Steele
> http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Felix Watts <[email protected]> wrote:
>> To clarify, my original post works if you use moq. You don't necessarily
>> need the call base depending on your requirements. Moq allows mocking of
non
>> virtual members just there same as virtual ones.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On 5 Oct 2011 15:14, "Gavin van der Merwe" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>> I think what you actually mean felix is using a partial mock which would
>>> be
>>>
>>> var m = new Mock<MobileRunReportHandler>() { CallBase = true };
>>>
>>> and then you would SetUp the calls you dont want to get through.
>>>
>>> The Rhino equivalent would be to use
>>>
>>> MockRepository.GeneratePartialMock<T>() etc.
>>>
>>> Also this stub above would not work properly because your Post method is
>>> not
>>> virtual ...
>>>
>>> On 5 October 2011 13:58, Felix Watts <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you use moq instead you can simply mock the concrete class with the
>>>> attribute already applied:
>>>>
>>>> var m = new Mock<MobileRunReportHandler>();
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Felix
>>>> On 5 Oct 2011 10:53, "mark Kharitonov" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I have this type:
>>>> >
>>>> > [RequiresAuthentication]
>>>> > public class MobileRunReportHandler : IMobileRunReportHandler
>>>> > {
>>>> > public void Post(MobileRunReport report)
>>>> > {
>>>> > ...
>>>> > }
>>>> > }
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I am mocking it like so:
>>>> >
>>>> > var handler = MockRepository.GenerateStub<IMobileRunReportHandler>();
>>>> > handler.Stub(x => x.Post(mobileRunReport));
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > The problem is that the produced mock is not attributed with the
>>>> > RequiresAuthentication attribute. I want the mocked type to be
>>>> > attributed
>>>>
>>>> > with the RequiresAuthentication attribute, because the code that I am
>>>> > testing makes use of this attribute. I would like to know how can I
>>>> change
>>>> > my mocking code to instruct the mocking framework to attribute the
>>>> produced
>>>> > mock accordingly.
>>>> >
>>>> > Note, that I cannot use IReflectionService, because I have no control
>>>> over
>>>> > the code which expects the attribute, so the mock must be attributed
>>>> > for
>>>> > real.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks.
>>>> > P.S.
>>>> > I have original posted this question on SO -
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7588597/is-it-possible-to-mock-a-type-with-an-attribute-using-rhino-mocks
,
>>>>
>>>> > but no one has provided any answer...
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> > Groups
>>>> "Rhino.Mocks" group.
>>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rhinomocks/-/oY4c0VAIRaIJ.
>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> > For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
>>>> "Rhino.Mocks" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
>>> "Rhino.Mocks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Rhino.Mocks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.

Reply via email to