I always recommend people take a look at this for reference https://raw.github.com/JonKruger/RhinoMocksExamples/master/src/RhinoMocksExamples/RhinoMocksTests.csas its (reasonably) up-to-date and is also (reasonably) comprehensive.
Steve Bohlen [email protected] http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com http://twitter.com/sbohlen On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Laksh <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you very much. Is there any documentation/ examples on how to do > this stuff. I was using this pdf at > > http://ayende.com/wiki/GetFile.aspx?File=Rhino+Mocks+3.3+Quick+Reference.pdf > but its not comprehensive. > > Also on the same topic, How do i test for each loop below? > > > public void DoWork(UserDocumentPackage userDocumentPackage) > { > var packageDetails = > userDocumentPackage.GetPackageDetails(); > if (packageDetails != null) > { > IList<PackageDocument> documents = new > List<PackageDocument>(); > foreach (UserDocumentPackageDetail packageDetail in > packageDetails) > { > PackageDocument packageDocument = new > PackageDocument(); > packageDocument.FileName = > packageDetail.GetUserDocumentNameWithNewExtension(".pdf"); > packageDocument.PrintOrder = > packageDetail.SequenceNumber; > packageDocument.PaperType = > DocumentPaperType.White; > packageDocument.OverlayText = "some text"; > packageDocument.OverlayTextAngle = 45; > packageDocument.ImageReduction = 10; > packageDocument.Duplex = true; > documents.Add(packageDocument); > } > package.Documents = documents.ToArray(); > } > } > On Nov 11, 3:47 am, Gavin van der Merwe <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Furthermore if you wanted to mock something like > > HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath(.NET Classes/Types) you would have to > > wrap it in a class and make the member that does this work virtual .. > > > > public interface IHttpContextService > > > > { > > > > string MapPath(string webUrl); > > > > } > > > > public class HttpContextService : IHttpContextService > > > > { > > > > public string MapPath(string webUrl) > > > > { > > > > return HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath(webUrl); > > > > } > > > > } > > > > public class ThingWhatUsesMapPath > > > > { > > > > private readonly IHttpContextService contextService; > > > > public ThingWhatUsesMapPath(IHttpContextService contextService) > > > > { > > > > this.contextService = contextService; > > > > } > > > > public string ThingWhatDoesStuff(string mapIt) > > > > { > > > > return contextService.MapPath(mapIt); > > > > } > > > > } > > > > [TestFixture] > > > > public class ThingWhatUsesMapPathTests > > > > { > > > > [Test] > > > > public void ThingWhatDoesStuff_should_MapPath() > > > > { > > > > var fakeContextService = MockRepository.GenerateStub< > > IHttpContextService>(); > > > > var objectUnderTest = new ThingWhatUsesMapPath > > (fakeContextService); > > > > objectUnderTest.ThingWhatDoesStuff("AnyPath"); > > > > fakeContextService.AssertWasCalled(x => x.MapPath(Arg<string > > > > >.Is.Equal("AnyPath"))); > > > > } > > > > } > > > > On 10 November 2011 23:33, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Only if the methods in the concrete class are declared virtual. The > two > > > kinds of things that can be mocked with RhinoMocks are: > > > > > 1) interfaces > > > 2) virtual methods in unsealed classes > > > > > Steve Bohlen > > > [email protected] > > >http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > > >http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Laksh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> correct..but not all the classes in .Net or my custom classes are > > >> sealed. You are saying if the class is not sealed, i can mock it > > >> without having the interface? > > > > >> On Nov 10, 3:27 pm, Patrick Steele <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Mocking an interface is easier. You can mock the virtual members > of a > > >> > non-sealed class. If a class is sealed or the members you want to > > >> > mock are not virtual, you'll have to create a wrapper (possibly in > the > > >> > form of an interface) in order to do your mocking. > > > > >> > --- > > >> > Patrick Steelehttp://weblogs.asp.net/psteele > > > > >> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Laksh <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > Thanks. > > >> > > I'm new rhino mocks and never used it before..so the questions. > > >> > > One last question. Is it necessary to derive all the classes from > some > > >> > > kind of interface? How do we mock .Net classes? > > >> > > for example > > >> > > MockRepository mocks = new MockRepository(); > > >> > > var myClass = mocks.Stub<MyClass>(); > > >> > > var list = mocks.DynamicMock<Array>(); > > > > >> > > On Nov 10, 11:51 am, Patrick Steele <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > >> Correct. Mocking only works if you control creation of the > object. > > > > >> > >> --- > > >> > >> Patrick Steelehttp://weblogs.asp.net/psteele > > > > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Gavin van der Merwe > > > > >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > >> > I think Patrick is saying that mocking MyClass this way is not > > >> possible. > > >> > >> > You need to structure your class in a de-coupled way ... > > >> > >> > public class ClassThatDoesWork > > >> > >> > { > > >> > >> > private MyClass instance; > > >> > >> > public ClassThatDoesWork(MyClass instance) > > >> > >> > { > > >> > >> > this.instance = instance; > > >> > >> > } > > >> > >> > public void DoWork(someInputParameters) > > >> > >> > { > > >> > >> > // do stuff with mocked instance > > >> > >> > } > > >> > >> > } > > > > >> > >> > On 10 November 2011 17:31, Laksh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > >> >> Thanks, i'll would do that, and we are using Repository > pattern, > > >> so > > >> > >> >> its easy change. > > > > >> > >> >> i have a question though. In my scenario the method returns > the > > >> > >> >> Package class so the caller of this method knows Package > class.so > > >> i'm > > >> > >> >> able to Assert the values. > > >> > >> >> If i have a method which internally creates instance of class, > > >> would > > >> > >> >> it be possible to mock that class. see the example below > > > > >> > >> >> public void DoWork(someInputParameters) > > >> > >> >> { > > >> > >> >> MyClass instance = new MyClass() > > >> > >> >> // do some logic here. > > >> > >> >> // I may use some .Net classes also to perform the logic > > >> > >> >> } > > > > >> > >> >> is it possible to mock MyClass & .Net classes here ? > > > > >> > >> >> On Nov 10, 10:18 am, Patrick Steele <[email protected] > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >> > You want to make sure you have a loosely coupled > architecture > > >> so you > > >> > >> >> > can do your unit tests in isolation. > > > > >> > >> >> > The Manifest class you originally showed looks like it > needs to > > >> get > > >> > >> >> > data from a database (The GetData method). That dependency > on a > > >> > >> >> > database should be in a different component. One idea is to > > >> create a > > >> > >> >> > repository interface for accessing the data: > > > > >> > >> >> > interface IDataObjectRepository > > >> > >> >> > { > > >> > >> >> > DataObject GetData(IContext); > > > > >> > >> >> > } > > > > >> > >> >> > Your Manifest class now has a dependency on the > > >> IDataObjectRepository > > >> > >> >> > which can be mocked at test time using Rhino.Mocks. This > way > > >> you > > >> > >> >> > don't have to have an actual database up and running to > execute > > >> your > > >> > >> >> > unit test for BuildManifest(). You don't have to worry > about > > >> proper > > >> > >> >> > table structures and things like that. > > > > >> > >> >> > So iyour Manifest class now takes in the repository: > > > > >> > >> >> > public class Manifest : IManifest<Package> > > >> > >> >> > { > > >> > >> >> > private IContext _context = null; > > >> > >> >> > private IDataObjectReposutory _repository = null; > > > > >> > >> >> > public Manifest(IContext context, > IDataObjectReposutory > > >> > >> >> > repository) > > >> > >> >> > { > > >> > >> >> > _context = context; > > >> > >> >> > _repository = repository; > > >> > >> >> > } > > > > >> > >> >> > public Package BuildManifest() > > >> > >> >> > { > > >> > >> >> > ... > > >> > >> >> > DataObject data = > _repository.GetData(_context); > > >> > >> >> > ... > > >> > >> >> > } > > > > >> > >> >> > } > > > > >> > >> >> > Now you can mock your context and repository and test to > make > > >> sure > > >> > >> >> > that your Package gets built properly based on the data > > >> returned by > > >> > >> >> > IDataObjectRepository.GetData(): > > > > >> > >> >> > // arrange > > >> > >> >> > var context = MockRepository.GenerateStub<IContext>(); > > >> > >> >> > var repository = > > >> MockRepository.GenerateStub<IDataObjectRespository>(); > > >> > >> >> > var do = new new DataObject { BatchID = "100", Title="Test" > }; > > >> > >> >> > repository.Stub(r => r.GetData(context)).Returns(do); > > > > >> > >> >> > // act > > >> > >> >> > var manifest = new Manifest(context, repository); > > >> > >> >> > var pacakgeManifest = manifest.BuildManifest(); > > > > >> > >> >> > // assert > > >> > >> >> > Assert.AreEqual(do.BatchID, packageManifest.BatchID); > > >> > >> >> > Assert.AreEqual(do.Title, packageManifest.Title); > > >> > >> >> > etc... > > > > >> > >> >> > --- > > >> > >> >> > Patrick Steelehttp://weblogs.asp.net/psteele > > > > >> > >> >> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Laksh <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >> > > GetData method gets the data from the database and then I > > >> assign the > > >> > >> >> > > data to Package class hierarchy. > > >> > >> >> > > I'm creating the instance of Package inside the method. So > > >> how Rhino > > >> > >> >> > > will test such things. My question was not only for this > > >> method. In > > >> > >> >> > > general it is very common we create instances of custom > > >> classes, .Net > > >> > >> >> > > classes inside the method. (Basically local variables). In > > >> such case > > >> > >> >> > > how do test the method using Rhino? > > > > >> > >> >> > > On Nov 9, 10:33 am, Patrick Steele < > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >> > >> What does GetData do? You probably need to stub that > out, > > >> but > > >> > >> >> > >> without > > >> > >> >> > >> knowing what it does, I can't say for sure. > > > > >> > >> >> > >> --- > > >> > >> >> > >> Patrick Steelehttp://weblogs.asp.net/psteele > > > > >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Laksh <[email protected] > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >> > >> > I have the following method. I'm creating a instance of > > >> Package > > >> > >> >> > >> > class > > >> > >> >> > >> > inside the method, setting some of its proeprties and > then > > >> > >> >> > >> > returning > > >> > >> >> > >> > it. How do i unit test this method using Rhino? > > > > >> > >> >> > >> > public class Manifest : IManifest<Package> > > >> > >> >> > >> > { > > >> > >> >> > >> > private IContext _context = null; > > > > >> > >> >> > >> > publicManifest(IContext context) > > >> > >> >> > >> > { > > > > >> > >> >> > >> > _context = context; > > >> > >> >> > >> > } > > > > >> > >> >> > >> > public Package BuildManifest() > > >> > >> >> > >> > { > > >> > >> >> > >> > // Data object is class which holds the data > > >> from > > >> > >> >> > >> > datasource. > > >> > >> >> > >> > DataObject data = GetData(_context); > > > > >> > >> >> > >> > Package package = new Package(); > > >> > >> >> > >> > package.BatchID = data.BatchId; > > >> > >> >> > >> > package.Title = data.Title; > > >> > >> >> > >> > package.Name = data.Name; > > >> > >> >> > >> > package.City = data.City; > > > > >> > >> >> > >> > IList<PackageDocument> documents = new > > >> > >> >> > >> > List<PackageDocument>(); > > >> > >> >> > >> > foreach (Document document in > > >> data.ConvertedDocuments) > > >> > >> >> > >> > { > > >> > >> >> > >> > PackageDocument packageDocument = new > > >> > >> >> > >> > PackageDocument(); > > > > ... > > > > read more ยป- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino.Mocks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
