Post removed due to "numpty" issue. On Nov 30, 1:46 pm, Patrick Steele <[email protected]> wrote: > It's not silly if you're using a mocking framework. ;) > > What you described is exactly what Rhino.Mocks does in the background > with Dynamic Proxy. Thus, it allows you to stub out abstract > properties. > > --- > Patrick Steelehttp://weblogs.asp.net/psteele > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:04 AM, bill richards > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Now you are just being silly! > > > You cannot stub and abstract class, it's abstract! > > > What you have to do is create a sub-class > > > class MyClass : AbstractClass > > { > > override public bool MyPeoprty { get;set; } > > } > > > On Nov 30, 9:01 am, hagai cohen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> sample: > >> abstract bool MyPeoprty > >> { > >> get; > >> set; > > >> } > > >> I would like to stub it with Rhino. > >> anyone ? > > >> hagai > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Rhino.Mocks" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
