Hi! So how the the test method should look like? MuxMux.
On 18 дек, 18:38, Tapio Kulmala <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > You are not testing your Collector at all, Create a real collector instead > of a mock. > > _collector = new Collector(); > > Tapio Kulmala > > "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have > others" - Groucho Marx > > http://twitter.com/tapiokulmalahttp://www.linkedin.com/in/tapiokulmalahttp://profiles.google.com/tapiokulmala > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:20 AM, MuxMux <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > > thanks for your reply, but your suggestion did not help. I got > > the same exception as before: > > Rhino.Mocks.Exceptions.ExpectationViolationException : > > Module.Execute(any); Expected #1, Actual #0. > > > MuxMux. > > > On 16 дек, 14:07, haifisch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Just make Execute virtual ;-) > > > > Br, > > > > Andreas > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Rhino.Mocks" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
