There's a few things to check: 1. "files" is an object (as defined by your code). Why not use var (to get the implicit string[])? 2. What's the signature of GetMailboxEntryIDs? 3. Is GetMailboxEntryIDs virtual? 4. Can you show the code where you create the mock?
--- Patrick Steele http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Rob Hammond <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Are COM objects / interfaces treated differently by Rhino Mocks when > you set up expectations? Here is a sample expectation I am setting > up, note _mockDomain is a mocked COM object: > > object files = new[] { "Core", "Device", "Xact", "SettingsFull", > "Settings", "DataStore", "Sync", "Unknown" }; > _mockDomain > .Stub(m => m.GetMailboxEntryIDs(Arg<string>.Is.Anything, > Arg<tAHDMailboxType>.Is.Anything, Arg<bool>.Is.Anything)) > .Return(files); > > When I get to the 'Act' portion of the test, Rhino Mocks returns an > instance of ObjectProxy instead of the string[] 'files' I have defined > in my test. > > Thanks, > > Rob Hammond > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino.Mocks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
