Hi Kenny,
without a deeper look at your problem I would advice you to restate your
test with RhinoMocks-AAA-syntax.
This might look like:
IGetRestuls resultGetter = MockRepository
.GenerateStub<IGetRestuls>()
> resultGetter.Stub(x=>x.GetSomeNumber("a")).Returns(1);
>
int result = resultGetter.GetSomeNumber("a");
> Assert.AreEqual(1, result);
I just wrote that down here in the editor so it might contain some bugs -
but the intention should be clear.
In general AAA syntax is easier to read/write and maintain.
Br,
Andreas
Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2012 05:51:15 UTC+2 schrieb Kenny:
>
> Hi all,
> I am new to Rhinomock. We are using C++/CLI, and we want to add
> Rhinomock to our unit test framework which builds in VS2008
> professional version. The tested Rhinomock version is 3.6 which
> supports C++/CLI. I created a C++/CLI unit test project of VS2008 as
> following, it can be built successfully. But when run the test method,
> it will throw an exception “..., System.InvalidOperationException:
> Invalid call, the last call has been used or no call has been made
> (make sure that you are calling a virtual (C#) / Overridable (VB)
> method)..” I searched on the web, and found people says this exception
> is usually for the tested function is non-virtual, but here it's a
> virtual one. At the same time, I create a C# unit test project of
> VS2008 with the similar code, and it could run successfully. I find it
> will be failed in C++/CLI project if I use "LastCall::Return" or
> "Expect::Call", throwing the same exception previous.
>
> /***************************** C++/CLI project code
> *************************/
> /****Successfully built, throw exception when run the test
> method.*****/
>
> using namespace System;
> using namespace System::Text;
> using namespace System::Collections::Generic;
> using namespace Microsoft::VisualStudio::TestTools::UnitTesting;
> using namespace Rhino::Mocks;
>
> namespace RhinoMock_Auto
> {
> template <class T> ref class Using
> {
> private:
> T^ m_Handle;
>
> public:
> Using(T^ Object)
> {
> m_Handle = Object;
> }
>
> T^ operator->()
> {
> return m_Handle;
> }
>
> ~Using()
> {
> delete m_Handle;
> }
> };
>
> public interface class IGetResults
> {
> public:
> virtual int GetSomeNumber(String^ data);
> };
>
> [TestClass]
> public ref class UnitTest1
> {
> private:
> TestContext^ testContextInstance;
> public:
> /// <summary>
> ///Gets or sets the test context which provides
> ///information about and functionality for the current test run.
> ///</summary>
> property
> Microsoft::VisualStudio::TestTools::UnitTesting::TestContext^
> TestContext
> {
> Microsoft::VisualStudio::TestTools::UnitTesting::TestContext^
> get()
> {
> return testContextInstance;
> }
> System::Void
> set(Microsoft::VisualStudio::TestTools::UnitTesting::TestContext^
> value)
> {
> testContextInstance = value;
> }
> };
>
> #pragma region Additional test attributes
> //
> //You can use the following additional attributes as you write
> your
> tests:
> //
> //Use ClassInitialize to run code before running the first test in
> the class
> //[ClassInitialize()]
> //static void MyClassInitialize(TestContext^ testContext) {};
> //
> //Use ClassCleanup to run code after all tests in a class have run
> //[ClassCleanup()]
> //static void MyClassCleanup() {};
> //
> //Use TestInitialize to run code before running each test
> //[TestInitialize()]
> //void MyTestInitialize() {};
> //
> //Use TestCleanup to run code after each test has run
> //[TestCleanup()]
> //void MyTestCleanup() {};
> //
> #pragma endregion
>
> [TestMethod]
> void ReturnResultFromMock()
> {
> MockRepository^ mocks = gcnew MockRepository();
> IGetResults^ resultGetter = mocks->Stub<IGetResults^>();
> {
>
> Using<IDisposable>(mocks->Record());
> resultGetter->GetSomeNumber("a");
> LastCall::Return(1); // throw exception at this line
> }
> int result = resultGetter->GetSomeNumber("a");
> Assert::AreEqual(1,result);
> }
> };
> }
>
>
> /************************** C# project code
> **************************/
> /***************** Successfully run the test method***************/
>
> using System;
> using System.Text;
> using System.Collections.Generic;
> using System.Linq;
> using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
> using Rhino.Mocks;
>
> namespace TestProject1
> {
> public interface IGetRestuls
> {
> int GetSomeNumber(string someInput);
> }
> /// <summary>
> /// Summary description for UnitTest1
> /// </summary>
> [TestClass]
> public class UnitTest1
> {
> public UnitTest1()
> {
> //
> // TODO: Add constructor logic here
> //
> }
>
> private TestContext testContextInstance;
>
> /// <summary>
> ///Gets or sets the test context which provides
> ///information about and functionality for the current test
> run.
> ///</summary>
> public TestContext TestContext
> {
> get
> {
> return testContextInstance;
> }
> set
> {
> testContextInstance = value;
> }
> }
>
> #region Additional test attributes
> //
> // You can use the following additional attributes as you
> write your tests:
> //
> // Use ClassInitialize to run code before running the first
> test in the class
> // [ClassInitialize()]
> // public static void MyClassInitialize(TestContext
> testContext) { }
> //
> // Use ClassCleanup to run code after all tests in a class
> have run
> // [ClassCleanup()]
> // public static void MyClassCleanup() { }
> //
> // Use TestInitialize to run code before running each test
> // [TestInitialize()]
> // public void MyTestInitialize() { }
> //
> // Use TestCleanup to run code after each test has run
> // [TestCleanup()]
> // public void MyTestCleanup() { }
> //
> #endregion
>
> [TestMethod]
> public void ReturnResultsFromMock()
> {
> MockRepository repository = new MockRepository();
> IGetRestuls resultGetter = repository.Stub<IGetRestuls>();
> using (repository.Record())
> {
>
> resultGetter.GetSomeNumber("a");
> LastCall.Return(1);
> }
> int result = resultGetter.GetSomeNumber("a");
> Assert.AreEqual(1, result);
> }
> }
> }
>
> And my environment is XP with SP3, and VS2008 Professional with SP1.
> So, my questions are:
> (1) are there some errors in the above C++/CLI project? If have, how
> to modify them, thanks.
>
> (2) If it's the Rhinomock own bug, how to workaround it or when it
> will be fixed. I saw Rhinomock has a commercial version. Does this
> version has this problem too, or is it well to support C++/CLI than
> the open source version？ Thanks.
>
> (3) I find there are nearly no C++/CLI examples provided by Rhinomock,
> does anyone can provided some. Thanks.
>
> (4) For C++/CLI doesn't support lambda, some syntax and other mock
> framework(like Typemock) can't be used. Is there other mock framework
> well to support C++/CLI? Thanks.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rhinomocks/-/zpN333v2utAJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
