On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 12:33, James Livingston wrote: > On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 12:12 +0000, Gisli Ottarsson wrote:
> > > 2) You only have the name of the song there, and I've got quite a few > > > songs that have the same name (and different artists). On my setup the > > > Title and Artist columns take up about 45-50% of the width of the > > > columns in the library. > > > > Is this tremendously important? Obviously, once the song starts > > playing, its information will be shown in the 'now playing' area. When > > you dragged the song to the queue you had all this information. The > > only time you might wonder whose rendition of 'Misty' is in the queue > > is when it was added there by another user, or by Shuffle. In the > > latter case, there is certainly no lack of functionality. Today you > > have no idea what songs Suffle-mode will play next, with this you would > > at least know the name of the song. I suppose the full information about > > the song could be provided as a tip-text (the type that pops up when > > you hover over an area), for the intensely curious. > > The main time I'd use the queue for more than one song is for a party or > something, and from my experience with that (using a playlist as a mock > "queue") plenty of different people come and play with it over the > course of time. Having the info in a tool-top would be acceptable > though. This is precisely how I would use it. At a party where everyone is a DJ. Admittedly, each participant would first scan the list to see what is currently in the queue and seeing only the name of the song could be limiting. Gisli _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
