On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:24:42PM +0200, Tristan Tarrant wrote: > On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 22:54 +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote: > > So there is still a fair bit to do, in my opinion, before anything could > > really be called a 0.9 release. > > > I disagree. I'm just a humble user here, but I believe rhythmbox should > get a series of "official" 0.9 development releases leading to a 1.0. > In this way you'll get far more people looking at the progress that has > been done.
Yes, that is what I meant. Maybe spread the previously mentioned points over the releases. Paul -- Student @ Eindhoven | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181 _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
