On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 10:20 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > The way we've (Colin and myself) pushed this first is the tla archive > has been closed for upstream Rhythmbox development. Development is now > done in GNOME CVS (as in the good ol' days), and we'll start pushing in > new features and bug fixes.
Why? Is TLA not working for Rhythmbox's needs? I have to admit that as a regular Darcs [0] user, TLA seems a little bit daunting in terms of it's interface, but other than that it seemed OK. - C [0] www.darcs.net _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
