It's more of bookkeeping. I expect people to put patches and everything in bugzilla. This more of, "hey I implemented this thing can someone test it?" But if we are moving away from all that I'm groovy with that and we can remove it.
Otherwise, I agree that the canonical spot is in CVS and people should get their fix from there.. sri On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:06:27PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:48 +0200, Jaap Haitsma wrote: > > Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > > Yeah, sorry I didn't do that. > > > > > > If you have an arch repository please mention it in the wiki: > > > > > > http://live.gnome.org/RhythmboxContrib > > > > > > I didn't add branch name which I should probably do. Since most of us > > > have a lot of branches. > > > > > > Also, it would be nice to switch to bazaar instead of tla since it's > > > a lot easier to use for newer contributors. :-) But no biggie if > > > you don't. > > > > > > Bazaar is located in: http://bazaar.canonical.com/ > > > > > > (or apt-get install bazaar if you're on debian type systems) > > > > > > > Since the main archive now is in CVS wouldn't it be a better idea to > > refer new users to CVS. > > > > The way I see it now (as an outsider, so I might be terribly wrong) is > > that having all these different archives with different functionality > > and patches is costing Bastien and Christophe a lot of extra time. I > > guess that for stability it would also be better if more people used the > > version in CVS. > > I completely agree with Jaap. Feel free to do versioning system tests, > but do that away from Rhythmbox. We ended up with 9 months of backlog, > and it's hard enough tracking Rhythmbox as it is. > > --- > Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
