> "Structured" doesn't matter. "Convenient" is more important. Is iTunes > interface convenient? (They promissed me a mac laptop, soon I'll find > out for myself).
I don't think convenience can be used as an argument here. The buttons would only be moved a few pixels =) Moving the button would break the iTunes feel, but bring in Gnome consistency. A real status bar have been added to Rhythmbox lately, so perhaps it might make sense...? > > The bar below the toolbar should be song specific, meaning it should > > only contain: song name, artist, album and duration slider. > > And the album cover :-) How could I forget the album cover?=) > If the play button was a toggle button there would be no need in pause button. That's a good point actually! Then it would be play/not play. Sort of a music On/Off switch. > I do find mysterious play/pause/stop button somewhat weird. I would say a stop button only make sense on hardware. > Again. media player is just not the tool for the task. The non linear > video editor or some VJing tool would have all the control you need to > find the particular frame in the video without having to wreck your > wrists. I don't see why not. Having one button is convenient.
_______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
