On 11/5/05, Artem Baguinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05/11/05, Martin Jeppesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm not sure I understand the rationale for that. The main song list > > > headers can be used to resized the columns, and to sort the song as well > > > here. So they are not "just titles". > > > > I expect that I can sort the column when I see a header of that kind. > > But it is only in the song list, that they can be used for sorting. > > right > > > > It might make sense for the > > > artist/album list, though I'd keep them since it may not be immediatly > > > clear to everyone what those 2 lists are about. > > > > To me these two are the most obvious, so in order to make consistancy > > I tried removing all the headers, and not just these two. > > > > Advantages: > > * Clear indication how the song list is sorted. > > * More space > > + you can add smarter sort orders, not just by single column.
Are you thinking of the bug about the album list sorted alphabetically or by year? > > Disadvantages: > > * No column titles. > > + hence can't add context menu for switching the columns on/off I wouldn't vote for putting it in the context menu, but why wouldn't that be possible?
_______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
