> There may be some X11/unix-isms in the code, but if someone got enough > of the gnome stack on Windows it shouldn't be too hard to get it to sort > of work. I'm sure there will be plenty of bugs where assumption that > have been made don't hold on Windows, but it should be do-able.
Perhaps this could be a goal after 1.0? And perhaps by the time, the remaining components have been ported to Windows as well?=) I wouldn't be surprised, if Rhythmbox could gain a huge marked share on Windows, as there probably doesn't exist iTunes alternatives, as they got iTunes.
_______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
