It seems like if someone wants to implement a plugin system for RB
this might be a good place to start looking to see would need to
be done.

sri

----- Forwarded message from Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
From: Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:50:47 +0100
Cc: aigiskos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules

On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 23:58 +0100, Chipzz wrote:
> > Gnome application is coming up with its own plug-in
> > framework-- thus needlessly duplicating work.
> 
> That's another thing - but weither that is possible... ?
> 
it is perfectly possible. There is a try in the gnome-office module in
CVS, which defines a simple plugin class with the common methods (load,
unload, get_list_of_interfaces), and then, that plugin implements a list
of interfaces (PluginInterface interface). There is a set of minimum
defined interfaces (document loader, with open() method, for instance),
etc

Applications can then just define their own interfaces for specific
needs, but if all GNOME applications used a common plugin system, I'm
sure there would be enough common plugins to share between different,
unrelated applications.

If we could have something like this in a widely used library, like
GLib, it would help a lot.
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
_______________________________________________
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel

Reply via email to